Dans un environnement résau sous UNIX, le partage de ressources réseau est importante. Hello Both NFS and SMB are file sharing protocols. – bakytn Jan 30 '12 at 16:30 Windows Server can provide a NFS share to other OSes, but the performance on a Linux client is very bad. NFS, Network File System, is a network filesystem originally developed by Sun back in 19diggity2. With NFS, a user or a system administrator can mount all or a portion of a file system. Et comme le protocole Samba est maintenant implémenté par défaut sur la plupart des systèmes UNIX, la question du choix NFS … It originally ran over UDP and was not completely compliant with POSIX locking semantics. The Common Internet File System (CIFS) protocol is a dialect of SMB which in turn is a collection of message packages that defines a specific version of SMB. Key differences between CIFS vs NFS. Sun Microsystems developed NFS in the mid-1980s with the goal of enabling file system resources to be shared over a network at a speed comparable to local file access.

It originally ran over UDP and was not completely compliant with POSIX locking semantics.

I then created a new NFS share and had Plex connect using that and I'm back to the 5 minute scan time. This is the old question though but at that time NFS were faster anyways. And besides, NFS is more "native" to Linux than SMB is (and simpler to setup). They are both NAS file level protocols. I'm looking for thoughts on the age-old CIFS vs NFS debate. NFS vs SMB Server Messaging protocol (SMB) is the native file sharing protocol implemented in Windows systems. NFS and CIFS are the primary file systems used in NAS storage. Choisir entre NFS ou SAMBA.

SMB uses share level and user level security to authorize access to file shares. Now that I have my data on a separate FreeNAS box I initially connected to it using 1GB NIC via SMB. Advertisements. File ownership and permissions get managed by login credentials. Sun Microsystems developed NFS in the mid-1980s with the goal of enabling file system resources to be shared over a network at a speed comparable to local file access.

Neither of them supports it straig away and needs manual adjustments. Performance seems to be faster than SMB though. If you add the source at a top level you only have to do this once. So you aren´t stuck to SMB.

2016-09-23. AFAICT (no benchmarks created) SMB works pretty good while using Kodi on Windows. netbooks, laptops). Therefore, they think I should implement CIFS home directories. NFS, Network File System, is a network filesystem originally developed by Sun back in 19diggity2. NFS (Network File System) Originally comming from the unix/linux world, it has really poor integration into windows and mac. Some NAS systems are also able to share both, NFS and SMB. SMB uses share level and user level security to authorize access to file shares. Et comme le protocole Samba est maintenant implémenté par défaut sur la plupart des systèmes UNIX, la question du choix NFS ou SAMBA peut se poser. NFS mount options use export policies in addition to file and folder permissions as a … However when transferring files to and from I maxed out my 1GB NIC. History of NFS vs. CIFS/SMB. It is better suitable for server to server file transfer. Its only form of authentication for the original implementations was source address, and requiring connections with a low (root owned) source port. Neither of them supports it straig away and needs manual adjustments. Dans un environnement résau sous UNIX, le partage de ressources réseau est importante. A file system can be exported over both the CIFS and NFS protocols.

FTP transfers individual files, and can translate file types to connect dissimilar systems. NFS can work in windows, but every time i tried i had problems with it (with external tools, with MS Windows Services for UNIX or with more recent windows server 2012). It couldn't get any easier.

Performance seems to be faster than SMB though. 2016-09-23. NFS (Network File System) Originally comming from the unix/linux world, it has really poor integration into windows and mac. Deploy a Windows NFS file server in a predominantly non-Windows operating system environment to provide non-Windows client computers access to NFS … From my [somewhat limited] experience NFS is much easier to set up and just tends to work.

YMMV NFSv2 was the first version released outside of Sun. The fact the SMB is not case sensitive where NFS is may be making a big difference when it comes to a search. Use a Windows NFS file server to provide multi-protocol access to the same file share over both SMB and NFS protocols from multi-platform clients. crackers Wrote:Yeah, autofs with NFS is the only way to go, especially for mobile devices (e.g. Native file sharing protocols always win out In an intranet, network clients have several options, such as AFP, NFS and SMB/CIFS, to connect to their file server. And on my ATV4, after doing a fresh install of Infuse and adding my shares, Infuse via NFS was so much faster at scraping the metadata and thumbnails for my movies and tv shows. (2017-03-07, 15:47) elsmandino Wrote: If I have a Windows PC on the network, is my only option to use SMB? Choisir entre NFS ou SAMBA. CIFS is the Windows flavour and NFS is for Linus/Unix, but there is some degree of interoperability. NFSv2 was the first version released outside of Sun. History of NFS vs. CIFS/SMB.